Austin Zoo

Austin, TX · EIN 742927016 · Museum, Museum Activities · IRS code A50

Can receive a giftListed without being asked

Their finances

from their own IRS Form 990, fiscal year 2024
Total revenue
$4M
$3,518,376
From donations
23%
$806K of revenue
Highest reported salary
None reported
no individual compensation on the filing
Spending breakdown — and why we do not lead with it
Spent on programmes
93%
$3M of $3M spent

A high figure here is not straightforwardly good. The measure counts money spent on programmes against money spent running the organisation, so it rewards charities that under-invest in staff, systems and evaluation — and it can be moved by accounting choices rather than by doing more. The largest charity raters publicly abandoned it as a headline measure for exactly that reason. It is here because it is on the filing and people look for it, not because we think it tells you who to give to.

Employees
68
Volunteers
—
Total spending
$3M
Staff costs
$1M

No comparison shown. We list only 1 charity under this cause with a filing, which is too few to rank against meaningfully. A percentile drawn from a handful of organisations looks precise and means nothing.

Figures are as the organisation reported them to the IRS. We do not adjust, score or rate them, and we do not combine them into a single number — that would require deciding how much each one matters, which is your judgement to make, not ours.

Is this your organisation? If anything here is wrong, out of date, or you would rather not be listed at all, tell us and we will correct it or remove you. We do not require a reason.

Against every Museum, Museum Activities charity in the country

1,191 filed under IRS code A50 in 2025
From donations
23%
higher than 15% of them
median 66%
Spent on programmes
93%
higher than 79% of them
median 78%
Highest salary
$0
higher than 0% of them
median $0

A percentile here is a position among charities the IRS classifies the same way — it is not a score, and being lower is not automatically worse. A large organisation running its own veterinary hospitals will spend a different share on programmes than one that passes grants through, and both are doing their job.